This article is filled with smart stuff and big accusations. Will print soon be out of the picture? Or even in the next hundred years? At the way things are going with the internet, blogging, and personal devices, print may have some steep competition.
But should there be a competition? So much information has already transferred to digital sources and people are not slowing down. One of the key things that these guys keep bringing up is the content of each medium and how they differ. Print is said to be richer and more accurate, while digital is the opposite. Digital is said to be two-way and unedited, while print is the opposite. All this may be true, but the lines are constantly being blurred. Print is gaining the use of QR-codes and digital is becoming more conscious of quality and accuracy. These two mediums may still be very different, but in time they will only flex to agree with each other. Print materials will be used where print is be suited and the same for digital. The trust issue will always be there. I guess it’ll depend who has the best track record.
For me, I am being exposed to so much more information, news and entertainment than ever before. Simply because the digital realm is inexpensive and easy to access. But is that all good? Buying a magazine (rarely) for myself can still show me that there is media out there that trumps the web in content. I know that when I surf the web there are sites that have poor content. But I also know there are sites online that have rich content. For me, it’s all a matter of quality and ease of access. As for the fate of each, It will be interesting to see how it all plays out.
Response to an article by Jeff Jarvis & John Griffin.